Institutional AI Strategy
Develop a clear, forward-looking strategy for how AI integrates across the university, academically, operationally, and culturally.
Includes
- 12-36 month roadmap
- opportunity and risk mapping
- leadership alignment
For Universities
I help universities navigate this transition at the institutional level, aligning curriculum, governance, leadership, and strategy in a rapidly changing landscape.
This is not a tooling problem. It's a systems problem.
AI is not arriving as a single technology that can be adopted and stabilized. It is evolving continuously, changing how students learn, how faculty teach, and how knowledge itself is produced. Most institutions are responding in fragments: isolated policies, experimental tools, and disconnected initiatives. The result is growing misalignment across the university.
AI systems are probabilistic, rapidly improving, and increasingly agentic. That means the problem is not simply integrating them into existing structures. The problem is that the structures themselves begin to break.
Universities need to be designed to remain stable as these systems evolve, not optimized for a single moment in time.
In practice, that means designing systems that fail safely, adapt quickly, and remain legible to both humans and machines.
Develop a clear, forward-looking strategy for how AI integrates across the university, academically, operationally, and culturally.
Includes
Design academic programs that remain relevant as AI capabilities evolve.
Includes
Create policies that actually work in a world where AI use is unavoidable.
Includes
Design how humans and AI systems interact across the institution, from classrooms to administration.
Includes
Ongoing strategic guidance for university leadership navigating high-uncertainty decisions.
Includes
Engagements are tailored to the institution, but they typically take one of three forms:
Universities typically reach out at specific inflection points. If your institution is in one of these situations, this work is designed to help bring clarity and alignment quickly.
The institution knows AI is important, but there is no shared understanding of what to do next.
A college or department wants to launch something AI-related, but the long-term model is still unclear.
Existing policies are breaking down as AI use becomes widespread across the institution.
AI tools and pilots are emerging across campus, but there is no coherent institutional structure around them.
Most university engagements are scoped around a clear institutional need, timeline, and decision-making context. Typical ranges are below.
Scope: 4-8 weeks
Typical investment: $20,000 - $30,000
Institutional assessment, leadership alignment, and strategic roadmap.
Scope: 8-16 weeks
Typical investment: $40,000 - $60,000
Program design, policy frameworks, or AI pilot implementation.
Scope: monthly / quarterly
Typical investment: $4,000 - $6,000 / month
Continued guidance as institutional strategy evolves.
Engagements are tailored to the institution. Final scope and pricing depend on institutional size, complexity, stakeholders, and goals.
Most engagements can begin remotely via Zoom and collaborative online work. On-site sessions and campus visits can be incorporated where useful and are scoped separately.
Most AI consulting for universities is either purely technical or purely academic. This work sits between those worlds.
I bring experience as a professor, AI practitioner, and founder, allowing me to translate between faculty, administration, and technical teams. That translation layer is often the missing piece in institutional AI efforts.
I am also actively engaged in public discourse around AI, which helps keep this work grounded in where the technology is actually going, not where it was a year ago.
If your institution is actively thinking about how to respond to AI, or struggling to align around a path forward, I'd be happy to talk.
Universities are navigating one of the most significant transitions in their history. The goal is not short-term optimization, it's long-term institutional stability.
Get in Touch